Moody's Investors
Service has assigned local- and foreign-currency issuer ratings of B1 to
the government of Zambia.
The outlook on these ratings is stable.
The B1 ratings
reflect the following key factors:
1) Expectation of
continued rapid growth, which should support economic diversification and over
time increase the country's low wealth levels.
2) The country's
track record of political stability, which benefits its developing
institutional strength.
3) Zambia's low
albeit improved financial strength, following debt forgiveness from official
creditors in 2006.
At the same time,
Moody's has assigned Zambia a Baa3 local-currency country risk ceiling, which
is the maximum credit rating achievable in local currency for a debt issuer
domiciled in that country. Moody's has also assigned Zambia a Ba2
foreign-currency bond country ceiling and a B2 country ceiling for
foreign-currency bank deposits. These ceilings are lower than the
local-currency ceiling as they also capture foreign-currency transfer and convertibility
risks.
The first key
factor underlying Moody's assignment of a B1 rating to Zambia is our
expectation of a continuation of the rapid economic growth that the country has
enjoyed in recent years due to buoyant global copper prices and production,
combined with growing foreign direct investment (FDI).
Moody's expects Zambia's
economy to grow by 7.3% in 2012, up from 6.6% in 2011, on the back of strong
growth in copper and agricultural output, in addition to the government's expansionary
fiscal stance.
GDP growth averaged 6.5% over the past five years, reaching a
peak of 7.6% in 2010.
Zambia's strong economic growth performance however is
balanced against a low per capita GDP on a purchasing power parity basis,
relative to its B1-rated peers, and an undiversified economic base in which
subsistence agriculture accounts for around 70% of employment.
The second key
factor supporting Zambia's B1 ratings is the country's track record of
political stability which, in turn, benefits its developing institutional
strength.
This was highlighted by the peaceful transfer of power to the current
administration last year, following two decades of political dominance by the
previous Movement for Muli-party Democracy government. Moody's expects the
current government to continue to implement prudent macroeconomic policies,
with an emphasis on attracting FDI, alongside a commitment to increasing
employment and improving social conditions.
However, structural constraints
such as widespread poverty continue to hinder the country's institutional
development, as reflected in its relatively low scores on the World Bank's
indicies for 'government effectiveness' and 'rule of law'.
The third key
factor underpinning Zambia's B1 ratings is our expectation that the
government's low financial strength will continue to improve.
In 2006, the
country benefited significantly from an official debt forgiveness initiative.
General government debt as a percentage of GDP stood at 26% in 2011, compared
to 88% in 2005, a year before debt forgiveness.
Although the current government
is committed to a policy of fiscal prudence, the country faces significant
spending pressures due to public-sector labour demands for higher wages, social
spending needs and large-scale infrastructure requirements.
In April 2012 for
instance, the government granted higher-than-budgeted increases in basic
salaries to government workers.
Moody's expects Zambia's to post a budget
deficit of 4.1% in 2012, compared to 3% in 2011.
The stable
outlook on Zambia's B1 ratings reflects Moody's expectations of continued high
economic growth and the maintenance of a prudent macroeconomic policy
framework.
Moody's would
upgrade Zambia's ratings if the government's economic reform and investment
programmes were to lead to a material increase in economic diversification and
employment.
A significant improvement in Zambia's institutional strength would
also exert upward pressure on its ratings.
Conversely,
Moody's would downgrade Zambia's ratings in the event of a sustained drop in
global copper demand and prices, resulting in a significant deterioration in
the government's fiscal imbalance and the country's external position.
The principal
methodology used in these ratings was Sovereign Bond Ratings published in
September 2008.
No comments:
Post a Comment